Legal Opinion

Woody v. Waibel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1976PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action for damages arising out of defendant’s logging operation. Plaintiff, who owned a log truck, was hired by defendant to haul logs from a loading area in the forest to a log dump in Oregon City. During the course of the operation plaintiff was injured when one of defendant’s employees caused a tree to fall on plaintiff’s truck. Plaintiff filed a tort action in circuit court, whereupon defendant and Workmen’s Compensation Board of Oregon, as intervenor, contended that plaintiffs’ remedy was limited to Workmen’s Compensation. Pursuant to ORS 656.384(2), a hearing was held and the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Marcus v. Eastern Agricultural Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  5. Powell v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. S-W Floor Cover Shop v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Schaff v. Ray's Land & Sea Food Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Clark v. U. S. PlywoodOregon Supreme Court · 1980

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API