Hermosa Beach Land & Water Co. v. Law Credit Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Gurney B. Newlin, and W. W. Hyams, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment and an order denying a new trial.
The action was brought to quiet plaintiff’s title to lot 32 in block 49 of the first addition to Hermosa Beach, in Los Angeles County. The defendant, Law Credit Company, answered, alleging that it was the successor in interest of one Stiles, who, on February 15, 1902, had entered into a written agreement with the plaintiff for the purchase of the lot in question. The purchase price named in the contract was $135, of which $45 was paid in cash, and the balance was to be paid in two installments of $45 each, on October 2,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Luco v. De ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hayt v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Fleishman v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Strong v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. VanniniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Ingalls v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.