Ingalls v. Bell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
There are two appeals in this case. Defendants appeal from the judgment entered on the verdict of the jury and plaintiff appeals from an order granting defendants a new trial. Since each side is thus appealing, we will refer throughout this opinion to plaintiff and defendants in order to avoid confusion. The appeal from the order granting a new trial must be first considered, and the appeal from the judgment becomes important only in ease the order granting a new trial is reversed. (Jackson v. Dolan, 202 Cal. 468 [261 Pac. 706] ; San Jose Safe Deposit Bank of Savings v. Bank of Madera, 121…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Fredericks v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Wilcoxson v. StittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Niederer v. FerreiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Joe Balestrieri & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Berg Metals Corp. v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- State Bank of Burleigh County v. PorterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.