Smirnoff v. SAIF Corp.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) holding that his knee condition should be considered an injury rather than an occupational disease and that, consequently, his condition is not compen-sable because there is no medical evidence supporting the compensability of the claim as an injury. Employer has filed a cross-petition, asserting that the board erred in determining that claimant is an Oregon subject worker. We affirm without discussion the board’s determination that claimant is an Oregon subject worker. We conclude, however, that the board erred, as…