Legal Opinion

Luton v. Willamette Valley Rehabilitation Center

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 22, 2015No. 1002303, 1003063; A155280PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.

Claimant, seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) that reinstated and upheld employer’s denial of a claim for a right wrist injury. Claimant argues that the board erred in analyzing his right wrist condition as an occupational disease, both in failing to give adequate weight to the sudden onset of symptoms and because the finding of gradual onset is not supported by substantial evidence or substantial reason. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

We state the facts consistently with the board’s unchallenged factual findings.1 Claimant worked for employer Willamette Valley…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smirnoff v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Cummings v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Boeing Aircraft Co. v. RoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Dean v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  3. Jewell v. SAIF Corp. (In re Jewell)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Kiltow v. Saif Corp. (In re Comp. of Kiltow)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Miller v. SAIF Corp. (In re Miller)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API