Legal Opinion

Dynea USA, Inc. v. Fairbanks

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 2, 2011No. 0701731; A141297PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

This case requires us to determine whether the Workers’ Compensation Board correctly concluded that claimant’s condition — a methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection — was an injury as opposed to a disease for purposes of the Workers’ Compensation Law. For a disease to be compensable, employment conditions must be the major contributing cause of the disease, ORS 656.802(2)(a), whereas, for an injury to be compensable, work need only be a material contributing cause of the injury, Coleman v. SAIF, 203 Or App 442, 446, 125 P3d 845 (2005). The board concluded that claimant’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. James v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Dethlefs v. Hyster Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. O'NEAL v. Sisters of ProvidenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blank v. US BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. City of Eugene v. McCannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Sheldon v. US BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Simi v. LTI Inc. - Lynden Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API