O'NEAL v. Sisters of Providence
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.
The Sisters of Providence, operators of St. Vincent Hospital (employer), appeal from a circuit court order affirming a Workmen’s Compensation Board order. The Board reversed a hearings referee and held that claimant was entitled to compensation for leg muscle problems which were attributed in part to her employment.
The essence of employer’s position is that claimant’s claim is not compensable because it is not work-related or because it represented the continuation of a condition for which a claim was accepted and closed by a determination order, dated June 7, 1972, which did not award any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Beaudry v. Winchester Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Mathis v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- White v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by24 opinions
- James v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Mathel v. Josephine CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Valtinson v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- James v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Smirnoff v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.