Legal Opinion

City of Albany v. Cary

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 10, 2005No. 02-00211; A122669PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P.J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that claimant has a compensable occupational disease of the inner ear, encompassing a perilymphatic fistula and unilateral hyperactive labyrinthitis. Employer contends that claimant’s condition is properly analyzed as an injury and that the claim should be denied as untimely. If the claim is analyzed as an occupational disease, then employer challenges the board’s determination that the claim was both timely and compensable. Claimant has filed a cross-petition, asserting that the board did not adequately explain its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schoch v. Leupold & StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Smirnoff v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Gormley v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Wayne-Dalton Corp. v. MulfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Liberty M & Saif Corp. v. Lynch Co. (In re Comp. of Alcorn)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Cascade in Home Care, LLC v. Hooks (In re Comp. of Hooks)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API