Young v. Hermiston Good Samaritan
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding employer’s denial of her new or omitted medical condition claim for radiculopathy. The board issued its order after determining, based on medical evidence, that “radiculopathy” is merely a symptom and not a medical condition. Claimant asserts, additionally, that the board erred in upholding employer’s denial of her current combined condition. We conclude that the board did not err with respect to either claim and affirm.
The relevant facts are uncontested. Claimant worked for employer as an aide in an assisted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Coast Security Mortgage Corp. v. Real Estate AgencyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- COST SECURITY v. Real Estate AgencyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. PiwowarOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- SAIF Corp. v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Crawford v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Garcia-Solis v. Farmers Ins. Co. (In re Comp. of Garcia-Solis)Oregon Supreme Court · 2019
- De Los-Santos v. Si Pac Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Murdoch v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- SAIF Corp. v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.