Legal Opinion

James v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1981No. WCB 77-6474, CA 14647, SC 26888PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, C. J.

The claimant seeks Workers’ Compensation benefits because of a mental condition allegedly arising out of and in the course of her employment. The Court of Appeals affirmed an award of benefits. 44 Or App 405, 605 P2d 1368 (1980). We granted review in this case and four others involving claims for benefits for a mental condition. Castro v. SAIF, 44 Or App 296, 605 P2d 1389 (1980); Maddox v. SAIF, 44 Or App 520, 605 P2d 1391 (1980); Mitchell v. SAIF, 44 Or App 656, 606 P2d 697 (1980); Paresi v. SAIF, 44 Or App 689, 606 P2d 1172 (1980).

The plaintiff is a woman of about 35 years. In October 1976,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Coday v. WILLAMETTE TUG & BARGE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Beaudry v. Winchester Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Olson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. GygiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Dethlefs v. Hyster Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Mathel v. Josephine CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API