Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Veach

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1943No. Civ. 13829PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Parker), J.

In this action to enjoin the violation of building setback restrictions, plaintiffs obtained judgment requiring defendants to move the building erected by them in violation of the restrictions or to pay $1,000 damages.

The tract of land involved herein, consisting of 12 lots, included 10 hillside lots, the fronts of which adjoined a semicircular street that extended up-grade in a northerly direction. Beginning at the southerly end of the tract and extending northerly, the lots fronting on that street were numbered from 1 to 10 inclusive. Generally stated, the lots faced as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Stewart v. FinkelstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Alderson v. CuttingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Standard Brands of California v. BryceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Walker v. HaslettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Singleton v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Christensen v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Warsaw v. Chicago Metallic Ceilings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Graven v. BackusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Brown Derby Hollywood Corp. v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API