Legal Opinion

Brown Derby Hollywood Corp. v. Hatton

California Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1964No. L. A. 27535PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, C. J.

In 1945, Elizabeth Haun 1 leased a building at 1610 North Vine Street in Los Angeles to defendant Joseph Hatton that he used as a restaurant. Elizabeth Haun also owned adjacent property to the north and east of this building that she leased to System Auto Parks as a parking lot. Shortly after defendant Hatton started his restaurant, he began using a strip of the land leased to System Auto Parks for the storage of garbage. This strip, approximately 5 feet by 48 feet, was adjacent to defendant Hatton’s building. System Auto Parks did not object to this practice and in 1947 erected four or five…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Christensen v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Felsenthal v. WarringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Morgan v. VeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Broads v. Mead and CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Dolske v. GormleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Warsaw v. Chicago Metallic Ceilings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Ass'n v. McMullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Guntert v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Papanikolas Bros. Enterprises v. Sugarhouse Shopping Center AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API