Standard Brands of California v. Bryce
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The plaintiff commenced an action in the Superior Court in and for the City and County of San Francisco by filing a complaint praying for certain declaratory and injunctive relief, to which the defendants Bryce filed an answer and a cross-complaint. The defendants Barrett and Ililp also filed an answer. The defendants Bryce moved for a change of place of trial to the county of Los Angeles. The motion was granted, and from the order the plaintiff appeals.
The allegations of the complaint show that the plaintiff owns certain real property in the city of Los Angeles. The defendants Bryce own…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sterrett's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Luckey v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cty.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Weygandt v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Donohoe v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Kaaa v. Waiakea Mill Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ermolieff v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Morgan v. VeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Southern Traffic Bureau v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Cook v. WinklepleckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Mission Imports, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.