Alderson v. Cutting
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The plaintiff recovered judgment for three hundred dollars damages for the violation of a building restriction. The defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The parties are owners of adjoining lots in block A of West Park Tract in the city of Los Angeles. The plaintiff acquired her lot, No. thirty-eight, in 1907. Lot thirty-nine was purchased by the defendant in 1909. The tract had been platted by its owners for purposes of sale, and all deeds made by them, including the deeds to plaintiff and defendant of lots thirty-eight and thirty-nine,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bennecke v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Bacon v. SandbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Gregory v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Firth v. MarovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Zipp v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Moore v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Edwards v. WisemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Capital National Bank v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- McBride v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.