Smith v. Calley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Respondent instituted this action in the court below to recover a judgment for damages resulting from a collision between his automobile, driven by himself, and a motor-truck, driven by Blaxazer Galley for the Maricopa Creamery and A. C. Ross, who were its owners. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of respondent, which, according to the findings, was composed of the following items: $528.40, as damages to respondent’s automobile; $51.60, for loss of wages, and $20, expended for medical attendance and nursing.
Appellants complain that there is no evidence to support the finding that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Menefee v. Raisch Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Byrne v. Western Pipe & Steel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Olds & Stoller, Inc. v. SeifertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lieb v. MayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Hand Electronics, Inc. v. Snowline Joint Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Nitta v. HaslamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Lane v. SpurgeonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Lauder v. JobeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.