Legal Opinion

Lauder v. Jobe

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1968No. Civ. No. 31380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

This appeal arises out of a double rear-end accident that occurred on the southbound portion of the Harbor Freeway. For convenience in this opinion, Wallace Jobe will be referred to as defendant Jobe or Jobe, and Alfred E. Lauder will be referred to as plaintiff Lauder or Lauder, although, as will become apparent below, we are actually dealing with consolidated cross-actions. Plaintiff Lauder’s 1959 Impala Chevrolet was traveling southbound in the lane next to the “fast” lane.1 He was following a Cadillac belonging to his friend, Eldridge. Apparently a metal box or frame fell off of a truck…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Emery v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Keenan v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Thomasian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Espinoza v. RossiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gerwin v. Southeastern California Ass'n of Seventh Day AdventistsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Jay v. DollarhideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Gillingham v. Greyhound Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API