Menefee v. Raisch Improvement Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.
An action was brought by plaintiff alleging that defendant corporation, in the operation of a motor-truck owned by it, negligently caused damage to an automobile in the possession of plaintiff, the elements of damage alleged being injuries to the automobile and the temporary loss of its use. Judgment was entered for plaintiff, from which defendant appealed.
The grounds urged for reversal are that defendant’s special demurrer should have been sustained; that the evidence was insufficient to support the findings, and that the court failed to find on the issue of contributory negligence.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rhodes v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Arrelano v. JorgensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Lucy v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Kincaid v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Overpeck v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Valencia v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Pfingsten v. WestenhaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Evans v. FaughtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Moore v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.