Legal Opinion

Lieb v. Mayer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 17, 1956No. 310PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Defendant has in the record one assignment of error as to the admission of evidence. Since this assignment of error is not set out in his brief, it is taken as abandoned by him. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544 (also printed with annotations in G.S. 4 A. p. 155 et seq.); Reynolds v. Earley, 241 N.C. 521, 85 S.E. 2d 904.

Defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial court to allow his motion for judgment of nonsuit made at the close of plaintiff’s case, and renewed at the conclusion of all the evidence. However, defendant concedes in his brief there was…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Pinnix v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Graham v. North Carolina Butane Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Mills v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Pike v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Jewell v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Short v. Chapman Ex Rel. RhoneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API