Byrne v. Western Pipe & Steel Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant Tallerday for damages sustained in a collision between motor vehicles. Tallerday has appealed from the judgment. The defendants alleged contributory negligence and Tallerday filed a cross-complaint for damages sustained by Mm in the collision.
Appellant contends that there is a substantial conflict in the evidence upon the issues raised by the answer and cross-complaint and that, therefore, certain alleged errors in the instructions are prejudicial. The defendants requested the court to charge the jury as follows:
“In order, therefore, to find a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. ZumwaltTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Wood v. MoultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Rhodes v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Metcalf v. MellenUtah Supreme Court · 1920
- Coleman v. LevkoffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Merchant Shippers Ass'n v. Kellogg Express & Draying Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Smith v. CalleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Zolkover v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Kirkhof Electric Co. v. Wolverine Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Kirkhof Electric Company v. Wolverine Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959