Legal Opinion

Leaon v. Washington County

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 1986No. C7-86-784PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

Will amendment of a John Doe pleading “relate back” to avoid the statute of limitations? We answer this certified question no. We also accept review and affirm rulings of the trial court adverse to plaintiffs’ various claims of liability against other named defendants.

On the evening of Wednesday, September 8, 1982, plaintiff-respondent Donald Leaon attended a stag party at the Green Acres Recreation site. On his arrival at about 11:30 p.m., with the party in full swing, Leaon was met at the door by about six men. They “escorted” him to a stage, where he was forced to lie…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Warren v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Stadler v. CrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Lange v. National Biscuit CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. K.A.C. v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Diedrich v. City of KetchikanAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Moore v. Michelin Tire Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Bohdan v. Alltool Mfg., Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API