Legal Opinion
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 27, 1993No. C1-92-479PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
This appeal raises issues relating to an employer-insurer’s subrogation action after the employee has made a pretrial Naig settlement. We hold that the defendant tortfea-sor is entitled to a jury trial, and we clarify the measure of damages and how the damages are to be determined. We affirm in part and reverse in part the court of appeals’ decision, Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc., 493 N.W.2d 128 (Minn.App.1992).
Plaintiff-employee Christian Tyroll commenced a negligence suit for injuries sustained on the job against the third-party tortfeasor, defendant Private…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Naig v. Bloomington SanitationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Vitanza v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Abraham v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Gray v. Badger Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Krueger v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.