Legal Opinion
Estate of Friedman v. Pierce County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1989No. 55192-8PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.
This case concerns a claim for damages by property owners on the ground of an inverse condemnation — a taking or damaging by zoning. The trial court granted summary judgment to defendant Pierce County, holding that plaintiff's action was premature in that plaintiffs had not exhausted their administrative remedies. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Estate of Friedman v. Pierce Cy., 51 Wn. App. 176, 752 P.2d 936 (1988). We affirm the Court of Appeals, but reject one of its holdings.
The action below was brought by Western Savings and Loan Association, d/b/a WSLA Development Corporation, and by an…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Presbytery of Seattle v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Chelan County v. NykreimWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Chelan County v. NykreimWashington Supreme Court · 2002
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.