Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Minneapolis

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 22, 2002No. C7-01-1676, C4-01-1683PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

On appeal after remand in this takings dispute, appellants City of Minneapolis and Minneapolis Community Development Agency argue that the district court erred by finding a taking of property even though appellants did not control respondent property owners’ use of their property. Appellants also contend that the district court erred by excluding from evidence a related United States Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals decision and by allowing respondents to offer hearsay testimony regarding their damages. Because we find that appellants’ actions do not amount to a taking of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API