Legal Opinion
McShane v. City of Faribault
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 4, 1980No. 49531PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
Defendants City of Faribault, County of Rice, and the Faribault-Rice County Joint Airport Zoning Board appeal from a judgment issuing an alternative writ of mandamus compelling the city to initiate eminent domain proceedings with respect to approximately 42 acres of land owned by plaintiffs James McShane and members of his family and affected by zoning regulations adopted by the board. Plaintiffs had sued in the alternative for an injunction against the ordinance, damages, or mandamus to compel eminent domain.
The trial court determined there had been a substantial diminution…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Harrell's Candy Kitchen, Inc. v. SARASOTA-MANATEE AIR. AUTH.Supreme Court of Florida · 1959
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Littlefield v. City of AftonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Armour and Company, Inc., an Arizona Corporation v. Inver Grove Heights, a Minnesota Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Snyder v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Spaeth v. City of PlymouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.