Legal Opinion

Builders Ass'n v. City of St. Paul

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 23, 2012No. A11-2270PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLLINS, Judge.*

Appellant Builders Association of Minnesota (BAM) challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent City of St. Paul. BAM argues that the district court erred as a matter of law in determining that the state building code did not preempt the city’s promulgation of a uniform egress-window policy. We agree, and reverse and remand for entry of judgment in favor of BAM.

FACTS

The facts underlying this case are undisputed. In April 2009, the city’s Department of Safety and Inspections adopted a “Uniform Egress Window Policy” in a memorandum…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State Ex Rel. McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. Modrow v. JP Foodservice, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Gary E. Mitchell, John DoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  2. Builders Association of the Twin Cities v. Minnesota Department of Labor and IndustryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Motokazie! Inc. v. Rice CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Centra Homes, LLC v. City of Norwood Young AmericaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  5. Daugherty v. Travelers Commercial Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API