Legal Opinion

Muehleisen v. Forward

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1935No. L. A. 15066PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a petition for a writ of mandate, to compel respondents as members of the city council of San Diego to call an election for the recall of certain officers of the city.

Five petitions were delivered to the city clerk on June 30, 1934, demanding recall of four members of the city council and of the city attorney. Notice of insufficiency of signatures was given by him, and supplemental petitions with additional signatures were filed, whereupon on July 23, 1934, the clerk certified that the requisite number of voters had been obtained, and presented the petitions to the city…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scheafer v. HermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Bricker v. BanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Sidler v. City Council of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Assembly v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. City of Glendale v. TrondsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Mefford v. City of TulareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Rees v. LaytonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API