Legal Opinion

Bricker v. Banks

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 1929No. Docket No. 3789PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

This is an original application for a writ of mandate to compel the city clerk of Stockton to certify and file two petitions, one for the recall of a city councilman and the other for the recall of four other city councilmen, and to compel the city council to call a special election to determine whether the councilmen named in the petitions shall be recalled. The city clerk refused to certify and file either petition on the ground that in each of them the statement of the reasons for demanding the recall contained more than two hundred words and one of them on the further ground that it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bennett v. DrullardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  2. Scheafer v. HermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Wilson v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. McCush v. PrattWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. State ex rel. Brown v. HowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Muehleisen v. ForwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Dubose v. KellySupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  4. Knowlton v. HezmalhalchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Moore v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API