Legal Opinion

Scheafer v. Herman

California Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1916No. S. F. No. 7589. In BankPublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the Board of Election Commissioners of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an original proceeding in this court against the board of election commissioners of the city and county of San Francisco, in mandamus, to compel the board to perform its duties with respect to a certain recall petition alleged to have been presented to the board for its action.

On September 27, 1915, the petitioners duly presented to and filed with the said board a petition for the recall of Percy Y. Long as city attorney of said city and county. There were appended to the petition the names of 10,395 persons, said number being more than ten per cent of the total vote cast for mayor of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coffey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Dinan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. Croly v. Board of Trustees of the City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. State Ex Rel. Heinig v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Pearson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Harnett v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Jenkins v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API