Sidler v. City Council of Bakersfield
California Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the city council of the city of Bakersfield to order and fix a day for the holding of a recall election. Writ issued. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Mandate to compel the respondent, city council of the city of Bakersfield, to order and fix a day for the holding of a recall election. A petition, duly certified by the clerk of the municipality to be sufficient and asking for the recall of a councilman, was submitted to the respondent council. Notice of the certification and submission of such petition was also given to the officer sought to be recalled by said clerk, as the city charter provided, and said official failed to take advantage of the option given him by the charter to resign. Nevertheless, the city council continued, and still…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Conn v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
3Cited by8 opinions
- Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Jenkins v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- McAllister v. Union Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Ratto v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Muehleisen v. ForwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.