Legal Opinion

Wolcott v. National Electric Signaling Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 7, 1916No. 374PublishedCited by 18 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Darwin S. Wolcott against the National Electric Signaling Company, in which R. A. Eessenden, intervened. On motion by Fessenden to strike out interrogatories filed by Wolcott.

1Opinion of the Court

DODGE, Circuit Judge.

The questions to be here considered arise under an intervening petition filed by Wolcott against Fessenden June 3, 1914. A motion to dismiss it was overruled October 20, 1915. The opinion herein of that date sets forth in substance the petitioner’s allegations and the relief prayed for 228 Fed. 811. Reference may be also made here, as it was in that opinion, to the decision of the Court of Appeals for this Circuit (National Electric Signaling Co. v. Fessenden, 207 Fed. 915, 125 C. C. A. 363) in the previous suit at law.

Wolcott is also plaintiff in the bill in equity…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Colgate v. Compagnie Francaise du Telegraphs de Paris a New YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
  2. J. H. Day Co. v. Mountain City Mill Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1915
  3. F. Speidel Co. v. N. Barstow Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1916
  4. P. M. Co. v. Ajax Rail Anchor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1914
  5. Gunn v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wise v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1935
  2. Kinney v. RiceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1916
  3. Terry v. StullCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
  4. Marquette Mfg. Co. v. Oglesby Coal Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1918
  5. Beacon Folding MacH. Co. v. Rotary MacH. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API