Legal Opinion

Wise v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided April 2, 1935No. 34PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

The application of the plaintiff, we think, rests in the sound legal discretion of the Court. It is unnecessary for us to consider the limitations existing at common law respecting the production of documents nor to trace the development of equitable Bills of Discovery, nor the statutory equivalents therefor. It is sufficient that the Delaware statute expressly grants to this Court that plenary power theretofore exclusively exercised by the Court of Chancery as to the production of documents.

Our first difficulty arises from the manner in which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Falco v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  2. Wolcott v. National Electric Signaling Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1916
  3. Kinney v. RiceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1916
  4. Davenport Co. v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Robertson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
  2. Riggs National Bank of Washington, D. C. v. ZimmerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1976
  3. Graham v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1963
  4. Graham v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1963
  5. Reeves v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API