P. M. Co. v. Ajax Rail Anchor Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
In Equity. Suit by the P. M. Company against the Ajax Rail Anchor Company. On motions to strike out portions of answer.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, District Judge.
Three motions are presented in an infringement suit brought on patent No. 1,014,155, issued January 9, 1912, to Adam T. Kramer, and duly assigned to the complainant. One motion is to strike out paragraph 6 of the answer, and require defendant to answer paragraph 6 of the bill which alleges that complainant gave written notice to defendant of alleged infringement, but that defendant disregarded the notice and continued infringing acts. Paragraph 6 of the answer admits receiving certain communications from attorneys representing the complainant, charging infringement of…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Luten v. CampDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
- J. H. Day Co. v. Mountain City Mill Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1915
- F. Speidel Co. v. N. Barstow Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1916
- Wolcott v. National Electric Signaling Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1916
- Kinney v. RiceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1916
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.