Legal Opinion

Marquette Mfg. Co. v. Oglesby Coal Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 9, 1918No. 955PublishedCited by 11 opinions

lu Equity. Suit by the Marquette Manufacturing Company against the Oglesby Coal Company. On application to defendant for an order requiring complainant to answer interrogatories.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, District Judge.

This is an application for an order requiring the plaintiff to answer two interrogatories proposed by the defendant under Equity Rule 58 (198 Fed. xxxiv, 115 C. C. A. xxxiv).

The suit is brought for an injunction restraining defendant from removing the vertical support of plaintiff’s cement mine by defendant’s mining of coal. Plaintiff manufactures cement from rock which it mines, and defendant excavates coal from a stratum some 500 feet lower. Plaintiff alleges that defendant so carries on its mining as to remove the natural support of plaintiff’s rock, and that it is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Union Pac. R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
  2. A. B. Dick Co. v. Underwood Typewriter Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
  3. Luten v. CampDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Bronk v. Charles H. Scott Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
  5. J. H. Day Co. v. Mountain City Mill Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Prince Line, Ltd. v. Mayer & Lage, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920
  2. Beacon Folding MacH. Co. v. Rotary MacH. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927
  3. Quirk v. QuirkDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1919
  4. John Wood Mfg. Co. v. Keiner-Williams Stamping Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1925
  5. Cobb Temperature Regulator Co. v. BairdDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API