Terry v. Stull
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor :
The interrogatories were filed under Rule 34 of this court. That rule was patterned very largely after Rule 58 of the Federal Equity Rules (28 USCA § 723). Mackenzie Oil Co. v. Omar Oil & Gas Co., 13 Del. Ch. 307, 119 A. 124. The Federal Courts have held that the 5Sth Equity Rule was intended merely to change the procedure in reference to obtaining discovery and to extend the right to a defendant as well as to a complainant; it never was intended to disturb the principles prevailing in the old practice, both American and English, governing the subject matter and the extent to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Union Pac. R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- Luten v. CampDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
- J. H. Day Co. v. Mountain City Mill Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1915
- F. Speidel Co. v. N. Barstow Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1916
- P. M. Co. v. Ajax Rail Anchor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Southern Production Co. v. SabathSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Austin v. TurrentineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Rebstock v. LutzSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
- Rebstock v. LutzCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
- Consolidated Film Industries, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.