Legal Opinion
Beacon Folding MacH. Co. v. Rotary MacH. Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 4, 1927No. 2727PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
This is an infringement suit, based upon three letters patent of the United States. In plaintiff’s bill of complaint, it prays that the court exercise its power to increase the damages conferred upon it by Rev. St. § 4921, as amended by Act Feb. 18, 1922, e. 58, § 8 (42 Stat. 392 [Comp. St. § 9467]). The plaintiff was allowed to file interrogatories under equity rule 58, addressed to the defendants, both corporate and individual. No objections were filed within 10 days after the service of the interrogatories, but, when the matter came before the court for appropriate…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Brady v. DalySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Gross v. Van Dyk Gravure Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- L. A. Westermann Co. v. Dispatch Printing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carter Products, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
- Activated Sludge v. Sanitary Dist. of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1946
- Trio Process Corporation v. L. Goldstein's Sons, Inc. And Metal Bank of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Muther v. United Shoe MacHinery Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927
- Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co. v. LemanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.