F. Speidel Co. v. N. Barstow Co.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
In Equity. Suit by the E. Speidel Company against the N. Barstow Company.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
The bill in equity charged infringement of letters patent No. 890,896, Tune 16, 1908, to Max Eessler, for process of soldering chain links. It prays for an injunction and accounting, and also prays specifically that the court may increase the damages to a sum not exceeding three times the amount thereof.
[ 1 ] The plaintiff has filed interrogatories, tire substance of the principal interrogatories being: First, an inquiry whether the defendant (has practiced the process of the patent in suit; and, second, an inquiry what were the steps of the process practiced by A. H.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Carpenter v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Luten v. CampDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
- J. H. Day Co. v. Mountain City Mill Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1915
- P. M. Co. v. Ajax Rail Anchor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Allred v. GravesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Wolcott v. National Electric Signaling Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1916
- Wilson v. Union Tool Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1921
- Terry v. StullCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
- Batdorf v. Sattley Coin Handling Mach. Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1916
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.