Legal Opinion
Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 13, 2010No. Civil Action 06-670 (CKK)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Larry Klayman’s (“Klayman”) [345] Motion to Disqualify this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 144. This represents Klayman’s second attempt to disqualify this Court in this case based on the allegation that certain of the Court’s rulings, combined with the fact that the undersigned was appointed by former President William J. Clinton, are evidence that the Court has an extrajudicial bias or prejudice against him. As the Court previously made clear in denying Klayman’s initial request for…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Ruth StudleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Sibley v. RobertsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Strange v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Walsh v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.