Legal Opinion
Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 5, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2006-0670PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
October 5, 2017
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs [414] Motion to Recuse/Disqualify Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, which seeks the recusal or disqualification of the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 144. This is Plaintiffs third motion for this purpose, and it is again Qpposed by Defendants. Upon a searching review of the pleadings, the record, and the relevant authorities, 1 the Court concludes that Plaintiff has failed to furnish any evidence of extrajudicial bias or prejudice.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jordan v. U.S. Dep't of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Ellis v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bishay v. HarrisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Chien v. FreerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Clinton v. HarrisonDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2025
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.