Legal Opinion

E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1992No. 89-16271PublishedCited by 337 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Defendant/Counterclaimant Joseph E. Gallo (“Joseph”) appeals. Plaintiff/Coun-terdefendant E. & J. Gallo Winery (“the Winery”), owned by Joseph’s older brothers Ernest and Julio Gallo, initially brought a trademark infringement action against Joseph for the use of the name GALLO on retail packages of cheese. Joseph counterclaimed against the Winery and Ernest and Julio, asserting that he had inherited a one-third ownership interest in the Winery (and thus its trademarks) from their parents who died in 1933. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Ernest…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by337 opinions

  1. Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Clicks Billiards Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Sixshooters Inc., an Arizona Corporation Ronald R. Forbes, a Married Man Jane Doe Forbes, WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. GoTo.Com, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Robin Fortyune v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

332 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API