Legal Opinion
Pulaski v. Ledwith
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 17, 1985No. 3046PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The plaintiff, who was seriously injured in an altercation with the defendant, brought suit against him claiming damages in the first count of the substitute complaint for an intentional assault and in the second count for negligence. The defendant filed an amended counterclaim for damages alleging trespass in the first count, assault in the second count and invasion of privacy in the third count. The trial court awarded damages of $28,410 to the plaintiff on the complaint and found for the plaintiff on the counterclaim. The trial court filed a lengthy memorandum of decision setting forth in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Styles v. TylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Boland v. VanderbiltSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. PresnickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Seperack v. SolazConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Baldwin v. BaldwinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Coles v. ColesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Kimbrell v. RossittoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.