Legal Opinion

Coles v. Coles

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 22, 1989No. 6400PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court dissolving the parties’ marriage, distributing their property and allocating their liabilities, and awarding custody of and support for the parties’ minor child to the plaintiff.

On appeal, the defendant claims six grounds of error that attack either the factual findings of the court, or its exercise of discretion. We will not retry the case. Pulaski v. Ledwith, 5 Conn. App. 629, 631, 501 A.2d 396 (1985). Our review of the record fails to disclose that the factual findings of the court were clearly erroneous in view of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Manzin v. United Bank & Trust Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  2. Pulaski v. LedwithConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Branigan v. CohenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  4. Leech v. RozbickiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kronholm v. KronholmConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  2. Baldwin v. BaldwinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. Cromwell Commons Associates v. KoziuraConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  4. Hughes v. Town of GlastonburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. Pietra v. American Factors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API