Legal Opinion
Boland v. Vanderbilt
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 22, 1953PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The plaintiff sued the defendant for damages for injuries received in a collision of their automobiles. The defendant denied the plaintiff’s allegations of negligence and charged that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff and the defendant has appealed from the judgment entered thereon, assigning errors in the charge and in a ruling on the admissibility of evidence.
The plaintiff’s claims of proof on the issue of negligence and contributory negligence were that he was proceeding northerly on Forest Road in New Haven early in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mourison v. HansenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Saddlemire v. American Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Bates v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Johnson v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Green v. StoneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Struckman v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Aspiazu v. OrgeraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Shelnitz v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Healy v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- United Aircraft Corp. v. International Ass'n of MachinistsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.