Legal Opinion
Baldwin v. Baldwin
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 22, 1989No. 7312PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of the court denying her motion to adjudge the plaintiff in contempt. The defendant alleges that the trial court erred in determining that the parties’ separation *421agreement was ambiguous and in finding that the parties intended that the gain realized by the plaintiff from the exercise of certain stock options did not constitute “income” as contemplated by the parties in that separation agreement.1 We find no error.
The parties’ marriage was dissolved on March 4, 1983, and their separation agreement was incorporated into the judgment. At that time both…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Lopinto v. HainesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Sturtevant v. SturtevantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Beach v. BeachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Isham v. IshamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Greenburg v. GreenburgConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Reichenbach v. Kraska Enterprises, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Sablosky v. SabloskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Birkhold v. BirkholdSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.