Legal Opinion

Kimbrell v. Rossitto

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 1, 1986No. 3205; 3268PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.

These two cases involve an ill-fated drug smuggling venture which rivals any current bestseller in its cast of colorful characters and its high seas intrigue. The actions were tried together and combined on appeal because the relationships and events giving rise to each case overlap substantially. In the first action, Kimbrell v. Rossitto, Kimbrell sued Rossitto to recover for the loss of a forty-two foot, 1975 Westsail cutter rig sailboat. Rossitto, in the second case, Rossitto v. Oslo Development Co., sought the return of certain real property located in Connecticut which he claimed Oslo…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Bertozzi v. McCarthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Fuessenich v. DiNardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Hartford Division, Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Amalgamated Local Union 376Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Cecio Bros. v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Polverari v. PeattConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  2. Zeller v. MarkConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  3. Coble v. MaloneyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. Cotton v. CottonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  5. Marshall v. DelponteConnecticut Superior Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API