Lamb v. Reclamation District No. 108
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Colusa County. The facts are stated in the opinion of Justice McFarland.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an action to abate and remove as a public nuisance a levee erected by defendant along the west bank of the Sacramento River, and across *126a place on said bank called Wilkins Slough, and to recover damages for the overflowing of plaintiff’s land on the other side of the river, about two miles below, alleged to have been caused by said levee. The case was submitted on certain parts of the pleadings taken as true. The court below gave judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment.
The Sacramento River is a large navigable stream, having its sources near the boundary line…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cairo & Vincennes R. R. v. StevensIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Dean v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- Hagar v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Green v. SwiftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Shelbyville & Brandywine Turnpike Co. v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
- Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.