Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Kalar
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 1976No. 11714PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.
Appellant, Daniel B. Carroll, brought this action against George D. Kalar and his attorney, George Oglesby, alleging that each was liable for malicious prosecution of a suit in malpractice brought against him. The Superior Court granted the appellees’ motion for summary judgment and Carroll has appealed. We took jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(e) 5, Rules of the Supreme Court. Affirmed.
On October 24, 1969, George Kalar, by George Oglesby, his attorney, filed a medical malpractice suit against Drs. M. S. MacCollum, John Ricker, and Daniel B. Carroll. It was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McClinton v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Slade v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Sarwark Motor Sales, Inc. v. WoolridgeArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Baker v. LeightArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Murphy v. RussellArizona Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Chalpin v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Bird v. RothmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Williams v. CoombsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.