Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Russell

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1932No. Civil No. 3124PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Arthur E. Russell, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against Ralph Murphy, hereinafter called defendant, to recover damages for an alleged malicious prosecution. The complaint set up in substance that defendant had maliciously and without probable cause charged that plaintiff was insane, and thereby procured his arrest and imprisonment for about -three weeks on an insanity warrant, and that on the hearing of such charge plaintiff was adjudged sane. The case was tried to a jury and judgment rendered upon a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $4,500, and, after the usual motion…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Ball v. RawlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Eastin v. Bank of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Brown v. SelfridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Grant v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Cullison v. City of PeoriaArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Slade v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Joseph, Md v. Markovitz, MdCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Bird v. RothmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API