Bird v. Rothman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.
In this case we are asked to review the trial court’s actions in a malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and negligence suit which terminated in favor of appellees, two Tucson attorneys, on all three counts. Appellant challenges summary judgment on the abuse of process and negligence counts, and a directed verdict for appellees on the malicious prosecution count at trial.
In February 1976, appellees, representing a woman who was injured at Amado Greyhound Park when the grandstand glass was shattered by a rock, filed a tort action which initially named only the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Martin v. TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Norton v. HinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Lyddon v. ShawAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- John Pochiro and Karen Pochiro, Husband and Wife v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Flaherty v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Oren Royal Oaks Venture v. Greenberg, Bernard, Weiss & Karma Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Beecy v. PucciarelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Nienstedt v. WetzelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.