Legal Opinion
Slade v. City of Phoenix
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 23, 1975No. 11708PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Justice.
The plaintiffs husband and wife brought an action for malicious prosecution, false arrest and false imprisonment against the defendants, City of Phoenix and Officer Warren Taylor. The trial court granted the motion of the defendants for a directed verdict, and judgment was entered in favor of defendants. This appeal followed. This Court assumed jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S.
The issue presented is whether the trial court erred in granting the motion for directed verdict.
No evidence was actually presented at the trial of this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Best v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Trollope v. KoernerArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- McClinton v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Catrone v. 105 Casino CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1966
- Sarwark Motor Sales, Inc. v. WoolridgeArizona Supreme Court · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Gasho v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- A.G. Ex Rel. Grundemann v. Paradise Valley Unified School District No. 69Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Cullison v. City of PeoriaArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Kimbley v. City of Green RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Donahoe v. ArpaioDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.