Legal Opinion
Chalpin v. Snyder
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 21, 2008No. 1 CA-CV 06-0371PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRVINE, Judge.
¶ 1 Simon D. Chalpin (“Chalpin”), and Hi-Health Supermart Corporation (“Hi-Health”) appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of their aiding and abetting claim against J. Kevin Snyder (“Snyder”) and his law firm, Robin, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, LLP (“Robin Kaplan”), pursuant to Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Chalpin and Hi-Health also appeal from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Snyder and the law firm on their civil malicious prosecution claim pursuant to Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure 56. For the following reasons, we reverse.
FACTS…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Fidelity Security Life Insurance v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- James C. Sell v. Hon. gama/squire & CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Hall v. READ DEVELOPMENT, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Havilah Real Property Services, LLC v. EarlyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Thompson v. PaulDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- Five Points Hotel Partnership v. PinsonneaultDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.